April Teen Court5/9/2017 Case 1: If the defendant wanted to talk to the victim about their situation do you think it was good idea to go to the parking lot where they were supposed to fight one another?
30 Comments
Marcela Cisneros Pd. 5
5/22/2017 01:25:44 pm
1. It would not have been a good idea to meet at the parking lot. This is because the other person most likely would get there believing that they were going to fight. This would put the defendant in a potentially dangerous situation that could be avoided simply by not going to the parking lot. It would have been best to tell the other person that she wanted to talk and then schedule a place and time.
Reply
Jacob Rivas
5/22/2017 01:30:53 pm
I do not believe that a parking lot is an ideal choice to settle an argument because there is no one around to secure and control the envornment.
Reply
Jazmin Mendez period 5
5/22/2017 01:31:33 pm
1.Yeah I think it is a good idea because she had said she blocked the other student SO she had no other way in contacting her.
Reply
Cristina Albarran per.5
5/22/2017 01:32:03 pm
Case 1: In my opinion I don't think it was a good idea to go to the parking lot where they were supposed to fight one another because it seemed like she did want to fight.
Reply
Arthur Perez
5/22/2017 01:33:13 pm
Im not sure but if she was going todiffuse the situation then maybe but I honestly didn't believe that was going to happen.
Reply
Ray Garcia
5/22/2017 01:34:22 pm
1) No because it would have led to something else, instead she should go to an adult and have someone be aware of the situation.
Reply
Jayleen De La Torre
5/22/2017 01:39:45 pm
Case 1. I don't think that it was a good idea for the two girls to talk out the situation in the parking lot where they had originally planned to fight.
Reply
Nathan Sierra
5/22/2017 01:40:26 pm
Q1: No because it will just lead to an argument and then a fight it's not a good idea and the defendant should have had the talk somewhere in public.
Reply
Ashley Cota
5/22/2017 01:42:50 pm
Case 1: No, it wasn't a good decision from the defendant's part to go to the parking lot where they planned to fight. Since, the defendant went to the parking lot it's insinuating that she wants to fight. She should have done is texted or talked about the fight before even going near the parking lot.
Reply
Rafael Gonzalez
5/22/2017 01:45:07 pm
1. I don't think it was a good idea for the defendant to go to the place where they intended to fight if she wanted to talk things through with the victim because by going to the place where they were going to fight, she knew that a confrontation was going to happen and she went regardless. The defendant and the victim agreed to fight at the place, not talk, so if the defendant wanted to talk, then she could've done things differently.
Reply
Francisco Rodriguez Per.5
5/22/2017 01:48:24 pm
Case1: No, I believe she should have talked about it somewhere else because going to that parking lot only meant one thing, the fighting area. I believe the defendant could have settled a talk before going to the parking lot.
Reply
Viviana Cabrera
5/22/2017 02:17:21 pm
1. No I do not believe it was a good idea because by going to the parking lot it showed they did want to pursue in fighting in some way because no supervision was gonna be present.
Reply
Julia Diaz
5/22/2017 02:22:11 pm
Case 1: I think she should not have agreed to talk to her in the parking lot that they were supposed to fight In because it could have led to the other girl believing that they were going to fight.
Reply
Anthony Acosta
5/22/2017 02:24:01 pm
Case 1: no I think not, it would have not been a good idea because there might be a temptation of fighting since they are in a sort of private place and no one can see them.
Reply
Nancy Lopez
5/22/2017 02:26:21 pm
Case 1: I don't think it was a good idea for them to plan to fight because that just give the impression that they both want to fight, so both of them are at fault for it in a way.
Reply
Karla Arce
5/22/2017 02:36:11 pm
Case 1: I don't think it was a good idea to go to the parking lot where they were supposed to fight. Maybe they could've talked over the phone or in person during lunch or something.
Reply
Daniel Reyes
5/22/2017 02:40:01 pm
Q1: If the defendant wanted to talk things out, I don't believe she should have not went to the spot where they were going to fight because the other girl might have thought she would have wanted to fight.
Reply
5/22/2017 02:40:12 pm
1)I believe that it was not a good idea because it usually makes it seem that they are going to get into a fight. The other person may have thought that they were going to fight as well
Reply
Katia Andrade
5/22/2017 02:45:21 pm
I don't think it was a good idea for the girl to meet up at the parking lot because that proves that she in some ways wanted to go on with the fight, I think she should've gone to a teacher.
Reply
Bianca Aispuro
5/22/2017 02:54:53 pm
Q1: Since the defendant stated that she wanted to talk about their situation I don't think it was a god idea to meet where they were supposed to fight because the situation would have heated into a fight like it did on campus
Reply
Sophia Flores
5/23/2017 09:04:21 pm
Q1: If the defendant wanted to approach the victim to settle things properly I don't think it would be appropriate for them to meet at the same place they were going to fight at. This could brought the message in which the victim believes that they might get involved in an altercation.
Reply
Janae Vasquez
5/26/2017 11:08:42 am
If the defendant wanted to talk to the victim about the situation like she claimed, she should have chose to pick a different location than where the fight was planned. The defendant should get her education wherever she will succeed the most, whether it be at a regular high school or doing independent studies.
Reply
Haya Villarreal
5/26/2017 11:20:26 am
Q1:I don't think they should have met where they were going to fight to talk because other students would encourage them to fight one another. The defendant should have told a teacher about the fight.
Reply
Destiny Reyes
6/1/2017 12:20:40 pm
Q1: I believe that if we ge defendant want to talk things out with the victim, I don't think they should've met in the same spot because that led or can lead to miscomunictions. They should've agreed to having a conversation and not fighting through a phone call.
Reply
Darlene Garcia
6/1/2017 12:29:40 pm
Q1. No this wouldn't have been a good idea because they would've been encouraged to fight and peer pressure is pretty strong.
Reply
Alejandra Garcia Period 5
6/1/2017 12:29:54 pm
I don't think she should have told her at the parking lot I feel like she could have told her earlier to avoid all of this problem.
Reply
Alfredo Alfaro period 5
6/1/2017 01:04:22 pm
Q1: I think it was a bad idea that their fighting in the parking lot because their will be people watching the fight and encouraging them to keep going of instead of breaking them apart.
Reply
Daniel Gaspar P.6
6/1/2017 01:36:38 pm
Case:1 No I don't believe that it was a smart idea to go to the parking lot where they were going to fight if the defendant wanted to talk about the situation, thing would only escalate.
Reply
Jose Lara
6/1/2017 01:50:20 pm
Q1: No because if they already had plans to fight, meeting at the designated point to fight would only escalate the situation. Especially after most of the school knew that they were gonna fight, meeting up at the spot they were supposed to fight with so many people around would only escalate the situation.
Reply
Sandra Giusto
6/1/2017 02:04:24 pm
1. The decision to meet at the parking lot was definitely not a wise one. Meeting at a place originally planned to fight at potentially indicates that the emotion or intention to fight can still be present. The two parties made an erroneous decision in choosing to meet there instead of somewhere neutral and more public.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |