DECEMBER 201812/10/2018 Q1: Do you believe the defendant was being truthful and taking the case seriously? Why or why not?
Q2: How did the conflicting testimony and summary of allegations impact the case? Which did you find to be more convincing? Why?
20 Comments
Kevin Perez per.5
12/10/2018 06:29:44 pm
1. I think the defendant wasn’t being truthful because he kept contradicting himself and said he didn’t remember to most of the questions asked to him which confused most of us and the jury’s.
Reply
nathan espinoza
12/10/2018 08:52:34 pm
Yes, the defendant was being truthful with telling his side of the story. But the defendant didn't take the case serious because probably to him it shouldn't have been taken that far.
Reply
Diego adame
12/10/2018 08:53:52 pm
1. I don't think he provided any help because he laughed a lot and just said "I don't know" to every question.
Reply
ruben moroz
12/10/2018 09:53:26 pm
Q1: I feel that in some parts he wasn't being fully truthful because he would trip up on certain points of his story.
Reply
Anthony MArtinez
12/10/2018 11:25:44 pm
Q1.NO the defendant wasn't being very truthful and as well was not taking is very seriously due to his false allegations, plus they did not match up to the statement.
Reply
Cristina Martinez
12/10/2018 11:26:10 pm
Q1- No the defendant wasn't being truthful, summary of allegations did not match up with statements. He wasn't taking the case as serious as he didn't have a reply for a lot of questions.
Reply
Isabel Parada P5
12/10/2018 11:30:02 pm
I believe the defendant was not aware of what he was saying due to his reasoning in everything he said which was whether idk or can’t remember and i feel like he lacked confidence in the case because it seemed he didn’t put enough effort into what he was saying.
Reply
Sam Rosas
12/11/2018 11:07:18 am
I believe the defendant was being truthful. The body language and tone presnted seemed acceptable.
Reply
valyk cerecedes
12/11/2018 01:14:22 pm
1. I feel like the defendant wasn't completely truthful because he seemed to get his answers mixed up
Reply
Jose Cedillo
12/11/2018 01:15:59 pm
Q1: I think the defendant was not telling the truth or either he was mixing up his answer because he seemed pretty perplexed when they kept asking him questions.
Reply
Summer Barrios
12/12/2018 01:14:44 pm
The defendant was being truthful. His body language told us a lot and the way he reacted to every question showed us that he was being honest. His tone of voice was calm. He did take the case serious bec the ablility of his emotions.
Reply
Kimberly Lopez P5
12/13/2018 01:15:28 pm
1) I don't believe that the defendant was taking the case seriously he was laughing and smiling throughout the questioning. And I don't really believe because I believe he took the trial as joke and that is why I don't believe him.
Reply
Jamie Benitez
12/14/2018 09:32:43 am
1. I do not believe the defendant was truthful at all. He did not take the case seriously because he would respond with, "I don't remember". He would mix up his own story and he could not give a reason for his actions.
Reply
Yuliana Chavez
12/15/2018 09:08:55 am
1. I believe the defendant was not being truthful and not taking the case seriously because he constantly changed his story and avoided questions by saying he didn't remember.
Reply
Brenda Hernandez
1/5/2019 05:10:49 pm
(1) The defendant was not being truthful because he kept contradicting himself throughout the case. I do not believe the defendant was taking the case seriously because he kept repeating that he didn't know or he didn't remember.
Reply
Julianna Vallin
1/7/2019 08:01:23 am
1.) I don't think that the defendant was being truthful throughout because he was answering the questions with "I don't know".
Reply
Bianca Aispuro
2/5/2019 09:12:09 pm
I do not believe the defendent was being truthful because of his lack of care for what was going on. He was laughing and not taking the questions seriously.
Reply
Anahi Hernandez
2/13/2019 08:24:55 pm
1. I believe the defendant was not completely truthful. He was unsure of his answers and would seem to change them here and there. He was not taking into consideration the fact that there would be consequences.
Reply
Sarah Simon
2/13/2019 08:58:29 pm
1) The defendant was not being truthful, the summary of allegations wasn't quite matching up with his own statement. He was being vague with majority bob his answers or didn't reply at all.
Reply
Andres Arzate
2/15/2019 01:24:00 am
Q1: I believe that the defendant was being truthful when answering questions but he wasn't taking the case very seriously. He seemed to get confused very easily by what the jury was asking and answered "I don't know" to many of their questions. He kept on getting confused when they asked him why he went into the restroom in the first place and grabbed the victim's backpack.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |