NOVEMBER 201811/30/2018 Q1: Do you feel the verdict was fair? Why or why not?
37 Comments
Destiny Rivera
11/30/2018 11:36:23 am
1. The verdict was fair especially based on the information given after the case. The defendant didn't have to hit the victim that many times and push him to the ground if he was defending himself. He even instigated by calling up and asking the victim if they were coming to the park.
Reply
David Hernandez
12/5/2018 12:26:30 pm
1) I feel that verdict was too lenient. The defendant was proved guilty and I believe that due to the fact that some people believed it was simply a part of the game the verdict was lenient. According to the elements of the crime he was guilty and he did not seem to regret his actions.
Reply
Isaiah Esquivel
12/5/2018 06:24:55 pm
1. I think it was fair because all the elements were thought carefully about
Reply
Ernan Cerezo
12/7/2018 01:52:01 pm
1) I feel like he was innocent because Tyler was doing the hitting in self defense because the other guy pushed him first
Reply
Summer Barrios
12/7/2018 03:01:29 pm
The verdict wasn’t fair because he wasn’t guilty. He acted out of fear. He explained that he had problems with the kid before and went the fight happened he was scared the boy was going to hit him again.
Reply
Gregory Escamilla
12/9/2018 10:42:35 pm
1. I don’t think that the verdict was fair because as he said he was scared for his life in that moment and they both had history together so they obviously didn’t like each other but he shouldn’t pushed him first
Reply
Haya Villarreal
12/10/2018 11:34:05 am
Q1: I do feel like the verdict was fair however I feel that we should have given more community service hours because it would have benefited the defendant.
Reply
diego adame
12/10/2018 08:49:12 pm
1. I don't feel the verdict was fair because the jury did not ask the proper questions.
Reply
Jose Topete per.5
12/10/2018 11:14:12 pm
Q1: I do feel the the verdict was fair because the defendant could have the left the fight and ran to the police.
Reply
Erick Ramirez Per 5
12/10/2018 11:14:32 pm
Q1: I thought the verdict was fair because the defendant did not engage the fight instead he ran to the police station, and did the responsible thing to do.
Reply
Anthony Martinez P.5
12/10/2018 11:34:52 pm
Q.1 In some sense I do believe it was fair because us the jury did not punish him as harass as we should have, but he did not have any records of any prior of fighting.
Reply
Cristina Martinez
12/10/2018 11:35:33 pm
Q1- In some sense the case was fair, but i do beileve the case could have given a stricter punishment.
Reply
Isabel Parada P5
12/10/2018 11:36:58 pm
I believe the verdict was fair in the sense of looking out for the defendant,they assumed this was to show the defendant not to do something like this again and there is consequences to one actions.
Reply
isabel parada p5
12/10/2018 11:40:33 pm
i believe the verdict was fair in the sense of looking out for the defendant, to show the defendant not to do something like that again and there’s consequences to one actions.
Reply
ruben moroz
12/10/2018 11:55:55 pm
Q1: Yes i feel that the verdict was a little bit unfair because he looked like a good kid.It also dint seem like all of this was a really big deal but it ended up being more than just a small fight.
Reply
Adam Lizarraga
12/11/2018 12:04:31 am
Q1- Yes I believe the verdict was correct because I don’t think that she was guilty and should have gotten more punishments.
Reply
Emily Lopez
12/11/2018 07:24:58 am
Q1: I believe the verdict was unfair because the right questions weren't being asked. There was a lot about the situation that was left unclear. The was the defendant explained the story expresses a self defense case, but the report said otherwise.
Reply
Eric Parra
12/11/2018 01:00:07 pm
I feel the verdict was not fair because the boys were playing a sport which was basketball and basketball is a physical sport. Also, the boys had a past and the defendant was only defending himself.
Reply
Isaac Noguera Per:5
12/11/2018 01:03:47 pm
1) I feel that the verdict was unfair, he should have been not guilty. He had a good reason for what he did. It was because of his past and he was scared. He was just trying to defend himself and trying to stand up for himself.
Reply
Jose Cedillo
12/11/2018 01:23:53 pm
Q1: I feel like he was innocent because he is a very active kid that has only gotten into fight in the past. He is also top of his class.
Reply
Andre Narvaez
12/11/2018 01:36:40 pm
Q1- I did not think the verdict was fair at all. The young boy had went to the lark to play basketball with his friends but things got a little intense and the two boys ended up fighting. The reason I had thought he was innocent though is because in the 6th or 7th grade the boy the defendant had fought had severely hurt him by pushing him into a steel pole and giving him back inflammation and causing him to go to the hospital. With that being said the defendant knew exactly what that other boy was capable of and reacted before it could happen again. Therefore the defendant reacted in self defense and should not have been convicted guilty.
Reply
Jamie Benitez
12/13/2018 10:22:28 am
1. I do believe the verdict was fair, but at the same time, I believe it was too lenient. There should have been more community service added so that the defendant could learn more from his actions.
Reply
Marck M. P5
12/13/2018 12:03:40 pm
1) I feel like the defendant was innocent because he was hitting in self defense because the other individual threw the first punch.
Reply
Kevin Perez
12/13/2018 12:28:46 pm
1. I don’t think the verdict was fair because he stated many times that it was self defense and he wasn’t gonna let the kid hurt him. Besides they already had problems in the past which explains why the defendant found the urge to defend himself from any violence.
Reply
Kimberly Lopez p5
12/13/2018 12:43:20 pm
The vertdicr was not fair because i voted not guilty there was some evidence that could of indecated that i believe that the past trauma made him acted in self defense.
Reply
Kimberly Lopez P.5
12/13/2018 12:57:21 pm
1) I believe that the verdict was unfair because there was a possibility that the defendant acted in self defense due to past trauma.
Reply
12/13/2018 02:26:02 pm
The verdict wasn’t fair because he wasn’t guilty. He acted out of self-defense. He explained that he had problems with the kid before and went the fight happened he was scared the boy was going to hit him again & he didn’t want to risk it.
Reply
Jamie Benitez
12/14/2018 09:37:53 am
1. I do believe the verdict was fair based on the elements being present. I do think that there should have been more hours added to his community service because it seemed a little too lenient.
Reply
Yuliana Chavez
12/15/2018 08:54:39 am
1. I feel that the verdict was not fair because he was defending himself from of a prior fight.
Reply
Brenda Hernandez
1/5/2019 05:21:18 pm
(1) I feel like the verdict was fair because he could have avoided the fight but he did not.
Reply
Julianna Vallin
1/7/2019 07:51:09 am
1.) I believe that the verdict was not fair because the boys had a past and the defendant was defending himself.
Reply
Janae Vasquez
1/21/2019 09:43:13 pm
I believe the verdict was not fair. It was a little too lenient because the defendant was at fault on multiple occasions. The defendant didn't give clear answers and did not seem to regret his actions.
Reply
Bianca Aispuro
2/5/2019 09:20:20 pm
I believe that the guilty verdict was fair. Although the defendant was obviously looking to get off clean he was very standoffish when answering questions and would try avoiding questions that would make him appear bad.
Reply
Anahi Hernandez
2/13/2019 08:18:41 pm
1. I feel like the verdict fair; the questions asked by the jury should have been more specific.
Reply
Sarah Simon
2/13/2019 08:50:59 pm
1) The final verdict might have been to lenient. The defendent was found guilty , but people did believe it was all in the way you played the sport(basketbal). Some jury members influenced for a much more linient verdict. Seeminglt so, the defendent didnt seem to feel any remorse to his actions.
Reply
Andres Arzate
2/15/2019 01:17:34 am
Q1: I believe the verdict was fair because even though he was defending himself he still took it too far and kept on punching him after he was on the ground. He still got into a fight and injured the other kid.
Reply
Maggie Grisco
2/15/2019 12:23:28 pm
1) I believe that the verdict was fair as the defendant was guilty.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |