November Session Teen Court 201512/7/2015 Case 1: Do you believe the defendant was mocking the jury when she said, "I am surprised you guys haven't asked why I did it" or just trying to defend her case? Explain Also how credible was her story she claimed she didn't remember a lot of things yet the total amount of the items taken were 924.
22 Comments
Amber Castillo
12/7/2015 12:53:44 pm
1. I do believe she was mocking the jury because after she stated that remark someone from the jury asked her why she did it and she didn't even answer the question. Her story isn't that credible because it seemed that she had gone over what to say, especially since she's in a senator program and she was a little contradicting.
Reply
Vincent Fuentes
12/7/2015 07:35:06 pm
Case1 I do believe she was mocking the jury, I felt that she tried to prove to us that she was better and cool in a way. I felt that she didn't give the whole truth as well.
Reply
Leslie Plaza
12/9/2015 08:09:20 pm
1. I believe she was mocking the jury. Throughout questioning, she wouldn't answer questions given by jury, so the fact that she asked a question for them basically leads them to asking questions she wants them to, not the questions she "didn't remember" about.
Reply
Leanne Caldejon
12/10/2015 10:02:18 am
1) The defendant was mocking the jury only to prove that she wants it to be known to the jury that she isn't intelligent just because she did something wrong. She wants to state in a way that the jury isn't as bright as she thought they would be. As far as her story throughout the trial, her story was not credible due to the fact that we can all tell that she knew what happened.
Reply
Karen Lopez
12/10/2015 02:22:06 pm
1. Yes, I would say that the defendant was mocking the jury in the first trial. It looked like she tried to make herself seem smarter than anyone else there. She clearly didn't understand that no one asked the question, because they did not want to ask that question, and when she was asked the question, she answered "I don't know". Her story wasn't very credible either, she changed her answers to certain questions pretty often, and she claimed that she didn't remember many of the things that happened. It's not believable that she completely forgot the most important parts of her case.
Reply
Rocio Camacho
12/13/2015 09:51:56 pm
1. Yes the defendant was mocking us but she was also trying to look better by saying that. She must of thought that we would go easy on her since she said why we hadn't asked her why she did it, she tried to appear honest.
Reply
Ernesto Garcia
12/14/2015 09:27:37 am
1) Being an AP student and in the Senators program, the defendant has the capability to think on the spot and come up with a story. I believe she was mocking the jury because she asked that question a few times and after like the third time the jury asked the question. He story is unbelievable because having the smarts she has, it is unlikely for her to forget and no know what she was doing.
Reply
Stephanie Godinez
12/14/2015 11:31:20 am
1. I believe the defendant was mocking the jury. She was doing this to prove to the jury that they are no better than her. However her story throughout the trial was not believable or credible.
Reply
Andrea Chavez
12/14/2015 12:54:18 pm
1. Yes. I believe the defendant was mocking the jury when she said that. It was not her place to even ask any type of question. Knowing that she was being non responsive with her answers previously, she shouldn't have asked a question. Furthermore, the defendant also claimed that she didn't remember much of what had happened. It it understandable that one can forget events that occurred, but in her case, she seemed to just say "I don't remember" to many questions that were asked.
Reply
Biane Arias
12/14/2015 05:19:34 pm
1. I think the defendant was mocking the jury trying to defend her case.She probably believed that the jury was not up too her level and she could out smart or belittle us. This made her story less credible because it reveled some of her character flaws.
Reply
Bianca Arias
12/14/2015 05:23:32 pm
1. I think the defendant was mocking the jury trying to demonstrate her superiority and wit but ended up backfiring on her and made her story less credible
Reply
Bernice Vega
1/11/2016 08:20:42 am
Case #1 : I do strongly believe she was mocking the jury when posing the question. This was verified when she didn't even respond once the question was asked. Her story also seemed to have too many holes in it claiming she didn't recall much.
Reply
Amalia Sanchez
1/11/2016 09:45:03 am
1. I believe she was mocking the jury in the form that she thought we didn't know what we were doing when questioning. She also didn't have any reply when confronted with her mockery. As far as her story goes, it wasn't very much credible because it somewhat contradicted itself as she went along with it.
Reply
Ashley Herrera
1/11/2016 10:56:41 am
1. I believe she was mocking the jury. Expecting the jury to ask the obvious, she didn't even answer the question. Her story was not credible due to her incapability of the question and you can sense that she knew she was aware of what was happening.
Reply
Adrian Flores
1/20/2016 01:10:19 pm
Case 1: I don't think she was mocking the jury, I feel that she was just a little confused on how the questioning worked. Since she was a straight A student, I believe she was well aware of the situation and what she was saying.
Reply
Bella Pinedo
1/20/2016 01:16:00 pm
1) Yes, I believe that the defendant was mocking the jury when she had stated that "I'm surprised you guys haven't asked me why I did it". It made it seem like she was planning what to say if that question was asked.
Reply
Alejandro Ortiz
1/21/2016 12:45:15 pm
I do believe she was mocking the jury in which it is a straight foward question that should be asked. Which is why it seemed like it was mocking the jury because it's a simple question and she wanted to be asked. Her story was not credible in which there is so much of her story missing. There is no way that one forgets so much of what happened during the day and has no explanation showing that she just did not want to talk of what happened during that interval.
Reply
Jackie Rivera
1/27/2016 06:44:51 pm
1. Yes I believe she was mocking the jury as well as trying to be smart to the jury because it seem like she planned her answers before she came into court.
Reply
Derick Villafuerte
2/1/2016 12:23:38 pm
1. Yes the defendant was acting like a know at all mocking the jury. It seems like she had her responses already in mind before she came to teen court
Reply
Samantha Leggis
2/16/2016 08:24:02 am
1) I do believe the defendant was mocking the jury because since she is highly intelligent, I believe she was using her intelligence as a tactic to take advantage of the jury.
Reply
Anette Gonzalez
2/18/2016 06:57:06 pm
1. Yes, the defendant was mocking the jury I believe she was trying to be smart with the jury. I don"t think her story is credible. It almost sounded as if she rehearsed it.
Reply
Rafael Gonzalez
2/19/2016 12:30:17 pm
I think she was acting like she knew everything about the questions and like a know-it-all. She wanted to give the impression of confidence and honesty but in the end, she seemed even less credible becasue of her acting.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |