Teen Court Blog October 2014
Case 1: Due to the fact that the defendant has committed the offense already once, do you think it will happen again? Or has the defendant learned his lesson?
10/21/2014 06:05:08 am
I think that the defendant has learned his lesson because the issue has been brought up. He didn't get away with it this time so now he suffers the consequences. Second case, not present.
10/21/2014 06:07:27 am
For the first question I believe that since the jury tried to humiliate him, he has learned his lesson and will not do the crime again. For the second question I believe that the girl stole for personal reasons due to the fact that when her father was mentioned, emotion was triggered in her
10/21/2014 06:10:33 am
Case 1: I believe that the defendant will most likely not commit the offense again. He seemed to have noticed the effect he left on his family and daily life.
10/21/2014 06:10:46 am
Case 1: I feel the defendant will most likely not commit the offense another time, he seemed pretty sincere about his answers and tried to provide as much information as he could, leading me to believe he has learned his lesson
10/21/2014 08:35:51 am
Case 1: I believe he will not commit it again. He is a good student academically and knows if he attempts it again, he will be risking his future.
10/21/2014 01:13:34 pm
1) I don't believe the defendant will commit the crime again. Having to endure a trial in front of his parents should be enough motivation to stop him from committing the crime again.
10/25/2014 01:54:40 pm
Case 1: I believe that the defendant won't commit the offence again because he was very sincere in his answers and it seemed like if he learned his lesson.
10/26/2014 05:04:13 am
First case: The defendant has learned his lesson, he got caught and now he has to pay the consequences. Second case: I think the defendant stole for the joy and luxuries she got out of it, she admired she enjoyed it .
10/27/2014 05:39:25 am
Case 1: He knew it was wrong, he seemed intelligent enough to realize it, and being caught most likely means he will not be charged with the offense again, or any offense for that matter.
10/27/2014 05:40:37 am
Case 1: The defendant will not commit the offence again for he is subjected to a punishment as opposed to the his first time committing the crime where there were no manifestations of punishments in any way.
10/27/2014 05:53:36 am
Case 1: I believe that the defendant will not commit the crime again because he was humiliated in front of his parents.
10/28/2014 11:48:06 am
Case 1: I believe the defendant will not do his crime again because during the trail he looked remorse.
10/29/2014 11:57:26 am
Case 1: I don't believe the defendant will commit the crime again because he seemed to have learn a valuable lesson.
11/2/2014 05:52:41 am
Case 1: If the defendant hadn't gotten caught, he most likely would've committed the crime again, but since he has now seen the consequences, it doesn't seem like he would commit the crime anymore.
11/4/2014 10:25:44 am
Case 1: The defendant has committed the same offense before, but did not get caught until the second offense. The defendant has learned their lesson due to the punishment given.
11/5/2014 12:14:25 pm
Case #1: In my opinion, I don't think the defendant will be committing the same mistake again. Although he got away with it once, the second time he was caught, and he learned the consequences that go along for the crime.
11/7/2014 12:54:32 am
Case #1: I only think the defendant will not commit the same crime again because he had been caught his SECOND time. I suppose he only learned his lesson because he was caught-- if he hadn't been humiliated, he most likely wouldn't have felt he'd done wrong.
11/7/2014 01:03:49 am
Case#1 In my opinion I do think she stole for personal issues. She felt the need to steal for her friend because she didn't want to lose her because of the fact she only had a few friends. She will not commit the crime anymore she has learned her lesson.
11/7/2014 01:04:05 am
1. I don't think the defendant will commit that crime again because she actually got a punishment this time. Her getting this punishment will probably make her realize that it's not right to commit any crimes and there are punishments for the wrong things she does.
11/7/2014 01:04:32 am
case 1: I believe that the defendant will not commit this crime again. She admitted that she did it and said she will never do this again.
Karla De La Torre
11/18/2014 05:14:27 am
case 1: I believe the defendant learned his lesson and won't commit it again , he seemed embarrassed and ashamed and he knows what he did wrong
11/18/2014 05:29:19 am
Defendant 1 I believe he will never commit the crime he seemed caring that this matters.
11/18/2014 11:23:15 am
Case #1: I do believe that since the defendant has been caught, he will not do it again. He probably feels guilt since he was caught and would not want to go through that again.
11/18/2014 12:31:39 pm
Case One: Even though the defendant had already committed the crime once, before he was caught, I don't think he would do it again, since it seemed as though he had learned his lesson.
11/18/2014 12:43:42 pm
In case1 I think the defendant learned his lesson because he and his parents felt embarrassed
11/27/2014 11:29:38 pm
Case 1: I believe that the defendant won't commit a cringe again because you can see he was ashamed
11/29/2014 07:18:59 am
Case 1: The defendant has commuted this crime twice already, but has only been caught once. I feel that the defendant has learned his lesson and this will not happen again.
12/3/2014 12:59:54 am
Case 1: The defendant wasn't caught the first which is why he did it again. Now that he was caught he will learn the consequences to his actions and wont do it again.
11/17/2015 12:08:41 pm
Case #1: i do strongly believe that due to the punishment given to the defendant they learned their lesson acknowledging that this time wasn't a major offense but next time the damage will be more serious and they were more than capable of making that connection.
2/27/2016 10:49:59 pm
Case #1:The defendant was seen committing his crime for the second time already.As far as this experience,he seemed very apologetic upon his actions and will most like move on from his mistakes.
10/28/2016 11:41:24 am
Case #1 The fact that the defendant had her cell phone with her when both her parents claimed she didn't, very much affected the credibility , this is because the parents stated the phone had been completely suspended. Therefore the fact that she had it completely disregard her credibility. The defendant in the first case considered herself the victim this shows that she might not have truly understand what she did to be wrong.
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.