Q1: Do you believe the defendant was being completely honest throughout the case? Why or why not?
Q2: Do you believe the uncle's attitude towards the situation affected the defendant's attitude in any way? Explain.
10/19/2018 12:10:44 pm
1. The case being presented seemed very practiced. Even though she said that she regrets everything, in that moment she didn't think about the consequences. Even though she didn't do anything violent, she did not remain neutral and got involved with the situation. She said she wanted to be the peacemaker but she could've helped in a different way.
10/19/2018 12:16:34 pm
Q1: I believe the defendant was being honest because she realized what she did wrong so the only thing to do was tell the truth
10/19/2018 12:16:45 pm
1. I don’t think she was being truthful. She just seemed to be answering the parts she wanted and then when she didn’t want to answer she would start saying “I don’t know”.
10/19/2018 12:16:57 pm
The defendant was most likely not completely honest throughout the case. She did not seem to be putting much thought into her answers. The uncle did not seem to take the case as seriously as he should’ve so this might have had an impact on the defendant as well.
10/19/2018 12:33:15 pm
I don’t think the defendant was being honest throughout the case bc her story kept switching up & it seemed like she was trying rlly hard to sound like she was genuine.
10/19/2018 12:36:20 pm
Yes the defendant was being completely honest throughout the case. She did not stay quiet or stutter at all. She did lie about somethings that were small not huge.
10/19/2018 12:39:06 pm
I think the questions that were givin to her were to simple for her to give us an easy answer and I also think the uncle was putting stuff in the defendants head which made her questioning different.
10/23/2018 12:20:57 pm
Q1) I do not believe the defendant was being completely honest throughout the case. I do not believe she was being honest because she seemed to be inconsistent with her responses. An example is when she said if she knew her friend had a gun she wouldn't have gone but she snuck out to eat with that same friend.
10/23/2018 06:18:52 pm
1) I don’t think she was being quite honestly throughout the case. I do believe she knew what she was getting into by going to the house with her friends. She could’ve been more supportive in other ways, but chose to go with her friends.
10/26/2018 08:19:44 am
(1) I believe the defendant was not being completely honest throughout the case because she kept stating that she was just trying to help and was not looking for a fight but if that were really the case she would not have gone with her friends to confront the person
10/26/2018 12:58:57 pm
Q1; I dont believe that the defendent was beign honest thorughout the trial. She not only seemed a little off but she changed her story many times.
Solomon Avina P5
10/26/2018 01:24:36 pm
1. I believe she was being totally honest through the case. I believe this because she said that she needs to be home and check in with her grandma and she did.
Abraham Ramirez P5
10/26/2018 01:25:15 pm
No because she said she was there to make peace but yet she already knew what was gonna happen No the uncle's attitude didn't affect the defendant's attitude because she took it serious and the uncle took it as a joke
Ernan Cerezo P5
10/26/2018 01:26:02 pm
Q1: I feel that the defendant wasn’t being completely honest because she kept mixing up her story in how they ended up at the house where they went to go fight, and she was saying that she was standing in the corner waiting, and that she was in the car waiting
10/26/2018 01:26:28 pm
I don’t believe the defendant was being honest theoughout the whole case. I think she pirtrayed herself to be innocent and trying to help others in her situation, but that wasn't the case. She constantly repeated herself, and her logic didn't make sense.
Isabel Parada P5
10/26/2018 01:27:28 pm
I believe she protrayed herself more than she actually is in terms of innocentence. She seemed to put an act, where she is absolutely pure and i don’t believe that because she kept on claiming she was there for support and wanted to be a good friend but if she was trying to be a good friend she could’ve just told them not to do what they did.
10/26/2018 01:28:38 pm
Q1: I feel like she contradicts herself throughout the whole case by saying one thing but doesn’t match up to another.
Erick Ramirez p.5
10/26/2018 01:28:54 pm
I do not believe the defendant was being completely honest because she kept say that she was there to make peace and knew how her friends were but she didn’t do anything to make peace.
10/26/2018 01:30:44 pm
1. I think she was because she explained everything exactly as it was on her case file.
10/26/2018 01:32:36 pm
Q1- i believe that the defendant wasn’t being 100% honest throughout the case because when it came to certain questions she couldn’t answer fully or she would be hesitant about her response or saying she was just trying to be a good friend by being “supportive “ throughout the situation when at the same time being a good friend would not be agreeing to something that would lead to trouble .
Isaac Noguera P:5
10/26/2018 01:33:58 pm
I believe that the defendant was being honest throughout the case, she’s not a bad person, she was just with the wrong people.
Danna Sanchez p.5
10/26/2018 01:36:35 pm
I believe she was was being 50% honest because she said she knew there was gonna be violence at the beginning but then later on when she was asked she said that she did not know there was gonna be violence.
10/26/2018 01:42:34 pm
I believe that the defendant was being honest but repeated many things verbally because they did not want the full truth to make them look bad.
David Bucio P.5
10/26/2018 01:45:39 pm
Q1: I do believe the defendant was being honest but she was trying to make herself seem like she is the innocent, supportive, and caring friend in the matter.
David Bucio P.5
10/26/2018 01:52:07 pm
Q2: I do think the uncle's attitude towards the situation made an impact on the defendant as a sign saying the court is gullible and this made the defendants attitude more cocky.
11/2/2018 08:54:52 am
1. No, i believe the defendant was not being honest. In the beginning she was attempting to sound better than she was with the strategy to make a good impression on the jury.
11/2/2018 09:14:51 am
Q:1- I don’t believe that she was being completely honest throughout the cause because she seemed to always be justifying herself. She wanted to make her friends look bad, and herself look like the victim in the situation. She wanted to look good to the judge and make it seem like she did nothing wrong in the situation
11/2/2018 10:17:41 am
1.)I believe that the defendant was not completely honest throughout the case because some of the things she said weren't adding up.
11/2/2018 12:12:31 pm
I believe the defendent was not completely honest during the case because she was referring to her friends in a bad manner to seem like she was better.
11/2/2018 12:24:27 pm
Q1: The defendant did an authentic impression. However she did seem to get a bit confused on the questions asked by the jury. In addition, with her composure she seemed to portay an honest figure.
11/2/2018 08:37:25 pm
1. I do not believe was being completely honest because she could not come up with a specific reason as to why she went with her friends to the scene where her friend pulled out a “gun.”
11/5/2018 12:29:11 am
Q1: I dont think the defendant was being fully honest throughout the case because she changed a few parts of the story she seemed to change it up a bit or get a bit stuck.
11/6/2018 11:29:19 pm
I believe the defendant was being honest but not intentionally because at first she would say something then later she’ll reverse what she said in the pass and would reveal other information.
11/28/2018 12:08:23 pm
1. I do believe the defendant was being honest throughout the case but at the same time, she would avoid the situation and keep going back and making herself look innocent. She would keep mentioning the fact that she tried talking the situation out but it did not work.
12/10/2018 08:33:40 pm
No, I don't think that the defendant was telling the truth when telling her side of the story. The defendant was missing parts of her story and back tracking the story.
12/10/2018 08:43:59 pm
1. I don't believe the defendant was being completely honest through out the trial because he changed his original statement.
12/10/2018 08:46:55 pm
1. I don't think the defendant was honest because he did not stick to his original statement.
12/10/2018 10:57:59 pm
Q1:I think the defendant was completely honest up to certain point during the teen court and defendant would have left out specif detail that defendant wouldn't want to mentioned
Anthony Martinez P.5
12/10/2018 11:42:13 pm
Q.1 Yes her stories were some what accurate to the statement but she had a little attitude towards the jury, and how they asked her questions
12/10/2018 11:44:01 pm
q1- She was being truthful but she did give attitude towards the jury.
12/10/2018 11:59:28 pm
Q1- No I don’t believe the defendant was being truthful because she would smirk and laugh whenever someone would ask her a question.
12/11/2018 12:57:13 pm
1. I believe she was being honest because her story was not different from the case, and she always had an answer, she never hesitated or had to think about her answers. She was always straight forward and focused into the case.
12/11/2018 01:06:27 pm
1. Yes I do believe she was being honest because she did seem to have good intention in the situation.
12/11/2018 01:28:57 pm
I do feel that the defendant was being pretty honest throughout the case. She seemed very intelligent and the type to not go to start problems. She had said she was there for the support of her best friend. Now although I still don’t think she was very smart for going in the first place she shouldn’t have been guilty. She was simply at the corner of the block until she got in the car to go pick her friends up but they ran into trouble with the owner of the house so she stepped out simply trying to calm the situation.
Kevin perez per.5
12/13/2018 12:19:02 pm
1. I do think she was being completely honest because she was answering all the questions thoroughly and regretted everything that happened that day.
12/13/2018 12:23:06 pm
The defendant was most likely not completely honest throughout the case. She just wanted to get it over with. The uncle did not seem to take the case as seriously as he should’ve so this might have had an impact on how the defendant grew up as a kid.
2/5/2019 10:21:03 pm
I don't believe the defendant was being completely truthful because although she said that she regretted what she had done and knew it was wrong she still did what she did. She also avoided answering a lot of questions that would make her look bad or answered with “I don't know” which was probably truthful.
2/15/2019 01:11:09 am
Q1: I do not believe the defendant was being completely honest throughout the session because it seemed like she had rehearsed what she was going to say. She avoided some questions by not explaining them fully and seemed to be hiding things.
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply.